Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Marta Soriano Santiago vs Harmony Tan Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Santiago vs Tan analysis and find out who is favored!
Marta Soriano Santiago vs Harmony Tan Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Santiago 1 - 0 Tan
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Santiago has won 48% of points on their second serve, while Tan has won 46.16%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Santiago, in recent form, has won 53.03% of their opponent's second serve points, while Tan has won 53.67%. The same stats for first serve returns are 46.88% and 38.33% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Santiago has saved 44.44% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tan has saved 60.4% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Santiago has won 50% of matches played (W/L 6/ 6), with Tan winning 57.38% (W/L 35/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Santiago has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 17/ 13), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 11/ 9). Tan has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 64% (W/L 9/ 5), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 128/ 124).
- Player level: In the last year, Santiago has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55.56% of matches (W/L 5/ 4), where as Tan has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 62.26% of matches (W/L 33/ 20). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Santiago winning 1 times and Tan being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Santiago winning 2 and Tan winning 1. The last match between Santiago and Tan was at the W60 Madrid, 13-06-2023, Second, Hard with Marta Soriano Santiago getting the victory 6-3 4-6 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:20:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Santiago and Tan have played a deciding set 1 times, with Santiago winning 1 times and Tan 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Santiago winning 0, and Tan 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Santiago has played against opponents with an average rank of 230.33 while Tan has played against players with an average rank of 289.3.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Santiago has won 75% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tan has won 53% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Santiago has converted 35.48% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tan has converted 50.26% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
700
Rank
578
High
18
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
226
Rank
90
High
26
Age
Plays
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
Form
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
56% (28-22)
Career Total W/L
55% (329-272)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
54% (13-11)
$0
Career Prize Money
$598,698
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Marta Soriano Santiago | Harmony Tan |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 16 | 11 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:20:0 | 2:20:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (52/92) | 51% (53/104) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 56% (29/52) | 57% (30/53) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 57% (23/40) | 39% (20/51) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (8/16) | 33% (5/15) |
| Return Points W% | 52% (54/104) | 43% (40/92) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 4-6 6-2 |
Stats 
Marta Soriano Santiago
Player
Harmony Tan
57%
(
52 of
92)
1st Serve %
51%
(
53 of
104)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
6
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
58%
(
23 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
20 of
51)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
43%
(
40 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
54 of
104)
106
Total Points Won
90
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Marta Soriano Santiago | Harmony Tan |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 54% (13/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 55% (29/24) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 54% (241/209) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 45% (5/6) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 70% (7/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.31 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 68 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.31 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 67 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:29:33 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 301.08 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 53% (837/1568) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 68% (569/837) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 46% (334/731) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 51% (81/159) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 44% (644/1468) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/3) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 65% (11/6) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 57% (12/21) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (3/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 73% (15/11) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 27% (15/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 22% (9/2) |
Marta Soriano Santiago Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Sarah Tatu
Player
Marta Soriano Santiago
65%
(
70 of
107)
1st Serve %
73%
(
59 of
81)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
2
53%
(
37 of
70)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
69%
(
9 of
13)
Break Points Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
50%
(
54 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
42 of
81)
95
Total Points Won
93
|
6-2 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marta Soriano Santiago
Player
Jizel Matos Sequeira Fernandes
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve %
47%
(
26 of
55)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
4
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
38%
(
27 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emma Ottavia Ghirardato
Player
Marta Soriano Santiago
52%
(
28 of
54)
1st Serve %
47%
(
27 of
57)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
3
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
8 of
30)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
48%
(
26 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arantxa Rus
Player
Marta Soriano Santiago
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve %
39%
(
19 of
49)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
100%
(
8 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
15%
(
6 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sapfo Sakellaridi
Player
Marta Soriano Santiago
49%
(
29 of
59)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
7
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
71)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Tatiana Prozorova
Player
Marta Soriano Santiago
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
63%
(
30 of
48)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Marta Soriano Santiago
Player
Jessica Failla
59%
(
52 of
88)
1st Serve %
64%
(
56 of
87)
4
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
5
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
37 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
40 of
87)
91
Total Points Won
84
|
3-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marta Soriano Santiago
Player
Dea Herdzelas
47%
(
30 of
64)
1st Serve %
63%
(
51 of
81)
0
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
5
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
81)
79
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Marta Soriano Santiago
Player
Destanee Aiava
43%
(
32 of
75)
1st Serve %
65%
(
39 of
60)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
8
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
51%
(
22 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
78
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marta Soriano Santiago
Player
Harmony Tan
57%
(
52 of
92)
1st Serve %
51%
(
53 of
104)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
6
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
58%
(
23 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
20 of
51)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
43%
(
40 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
54 of
104)
106
Total Points Won
90
|
6-3 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Harmony Tan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Harmony Tan
Player
Elena-Teodora Cadar
43%
(
16 of
37)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
94%
(
15 of
16)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
11 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Julia Riera
Player
Harmony Tan
40%
(
17 of
43)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
12 of
17)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Harmony Tan
Player
Nastasja Mariana Schunk
52%
(
84 of
162)
1st Serve %
72%
(
96 of
134)
3
Aces
4
8
Double Faults
4
69%
(
58 of
84)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
62 of
96)
53%
(
41 of
78)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
11%
(
2 of
19)
39%
(
63 of
162)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
51 of
134)
150
Total Points Won
146
|
6-7(3) 7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Olivia Gadecki
Player
Harmony Tan
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
41%
(
26 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Harmony Tan
Player
Alice Rame
48%
(
13 of
27)
1st Serve %
67%
(
6 of
9)
1
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
77%
(
10 of
13)
1st Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
37%
(
10 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
89%
(
8 of
9)
25
Total Points Won
11
|
5-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ella Seidel
Player
Harmony Tan
57%
(
12 of
21)
1st Serve %
25%
(
4 of
16)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
4
42%
(
5 of
12)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
48%
(
10 of
21)
Rtn Points Won
75%
(
12 of
16)
23
Total Points Won
14
|
4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Harmony Tan
Player
Tina Nadine Smith
49%
(
26 of
53)
1st Serve %
53%
(
30 of
57)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Harmony Tan
Player
Eden Silva
49%
(
22 of
45)
1st Serve %
78%
(
52 of
67)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
68
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jessika Ponchet
Player
Harmony Tan
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
48%
(
32 of
66)
3
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
8
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
26 of
32)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
10 of
34)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Iryna Shymanovich
Player
Harmony Tan
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve %
42%
(
29 of
69)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
6
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
14 of
40)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
36 of
69)
71
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Santiago Vs Tan Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
